BFRL Publications - nuclear power plants

nuclear power plants

• Analysis of Benchmark Exercise Two: An Examination of Large Turbine Hall Fires With the CFAST Fire Modeling Code.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Preliminary Results of Benchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Facility Applications. C/155-155 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/249-255 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Martin, A. R.; Coutts, D. A.
• Benchmark Analysis With COCOSYS. COCOSYS Calculations for Benchmark Exercise #1. Appendix F.
  NISTIR 6872; June 2002.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Cable Tray Fires. International Panel Report. Appendix F: Benchmark Analysis With COCOSYS, F/1-71 pp, 2002.
  Klein-Hessling, W.
• Blind Simulations Using CFAST 4.0.1. Benchmark Exercise #1. Cable Tray Fires of Redundant Safety Trains. Appendix H: Benchmark Analysis With CFAST.
  NISTIR 6872; June 2002.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Cable Tray Fires. International Panel Report. Appendix H: Benchmark Analysis With CFAST, H/1-44 pp, 2002.
  Will, J.
• CFD Simulation of a 2.5 MW Oil Pool Fire in a Nuclear Power Plant Containment Building Using Multi-Block Large Eddy Simulation.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Validation of Fire Models. C/77-79 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/141-168 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Floyd, J. E.
• CFD Simulation of a 2.5 MW Oil Pool Fire in a Nuclear Power Plant Containment Building Using Multi-Block Large Eddy Simulation.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Validation of Fire Models. C/77-79 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/141-168 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Floyd, J. E.
• CFX and COCOSYS Preliminary Results. DRAFT VERSION. (Fire Benchmark #2. Part 1. Fire in a Large Hall. Technical Note.)
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Preliminary Results of Benchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Facility Applications. C/85-116 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/193-227 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Klein-Hessling, W.
• CFX Simulations for Benchmark Exercise #1. Cable Tray Fires of Redundant Safety Trains. Appendix D.
  NISTIR 6872; June 2002.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Cable Tray Fires. International Panel Report. Appendix D: Benchmark Analysis With CFX, D/1-41 pp, 2002.
  Heitsch, M.
• Challenges in Use of State-of-the-Art Fire Modeling Tools in Nuclear Power Plant Applications.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Future Tasks and Benchmark Exercises. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/313-324 pp, 2003.
  Najafi, B.; Joglar, F.; Kassawara, R.
• Detector Response Modeling.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Future Tasks and Benchmark Exercises. C/165-169 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/291-295 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Beller, D.
• Enhancements to the FIVE Methodology.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Valication of Fire Models. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/97-114 pp, 2003.
  Mowrer, F. W.
• EPRI Guide to Fire Modeling: An Overview.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. Regulatory Applications of Fire Models. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/51-68 pp, 2003.
  Najafi, B.; Joglar, F.; Kassawara, R.
• Estimating Evacuation Time Components: Lessons from Nuclear Power Plants, Hurricanes, and the First World Trade Center Bombing.
  NIST SP 1032; January 2005.Workshop on Building Occupant Movement During Fire Emergencies. Proceedings. Session 4.5. June 10-11, 2004, Gaithersburg, MD, Peacock, R. D.; Kuligowski, E. D., Editor(s)(s), 91-95 pp, 2005.
  Lindell, M. K.; Prater, C. S.
• Features, Limitations and Uncertainties in Enclosure Fire Hazard Analyses: Preliminary Review.
  NISTIR 6152; 29 p. March 1998.
  Mowrer, F. W.; Stroup, D. W.
• Fire Applications of a Quantitative Fire Hazard Analysis Tool for Inspection in the U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Regulatory Applications of Fire Models. C/9-38 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/23-38 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Iqbal, N.; Salley, M. H.
• Fire in a Large Hall. Benchmark Analysis #2. Proposal for Part 2.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Preliminary Results of Behchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of fire Models for Nuclear Facility. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/287-289 pp, 2003.
  Miles, S.
• Fire in a Large Hall. Benchmark Analysis #2. Specification for Part 1.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Preliminary Results of Behchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Facility. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/189-192 pp, 2003.
  Miles, S.
• Fire Safety Research at NIST.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Opening Remarks and Research Programs. C/1-3 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/7-16 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Hamins, A.
• Fire Zone Model MAGIC: The Validation and Verification Principles.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Validation of Fire Models. C73-76 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/87-95 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Gautier, B.
• FLAMME_S Code Qualification.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Valication of Fire Models. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/69-77 pp, 2003.
  Casselmann, C.
• Foreseen German Real Scale Cable Fire and Functional Failure Tests.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Future Tasks and Benchmark Exercises. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/303-306 pp, 2003.
  Roewekamp, M.; Riese, O.; Hosser, D.
• Future Fire Research in IRSN.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Opening Remarks and Research Programs, C/5-7 pp and APPENDIX D: VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS, D/17-21 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, C/5-7 pp, 2003.
  Bertrand, R.
• HADCRT Results for Benchmark Exercise #2, May 3, 2002.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Preliminary Results of Behchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of fire Models for Nuclear Facility. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/257-267 pp, 2003.
  Malinovic, B.; Plys, M. G.
• Heat Release Rate Characteristics of Some Combustible Fuel Sources in Nuclear Power Plants.
  NBSIR 85-3195; 52 p. July 1985.
  Lee, B. T.
• Kerosene Fire Experiments.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Future Tasks and Benchmark Exercises. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/307-312 pp, 2003.
  Roewekamp, M.; Hosser, D.; Dobbernmack, R.
• Large Eddy Simulations of Fire Tests in a Large Hull.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Preliminary Results of Benchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Facility Applications. C/157-159 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/269-273 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  McGrattan, K. B.; Floyd, J. E.
• Methodology for Developing and Implementing Alternative Temperature-Time Curves for Testing the Fire Resistance of Barriers for Nuclear Power Plant Applications.
  NISTIR 5842; 116 p. May 1996.
  Cooper, L. Y.; Steckler, K. D.
• Misusing (Using) Fire Models.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Preliminary Results of Behchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of fire Models for Nuclear Facility. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/229-247 pp, 2003.
  Barnett, J.
• New Model for Time Lag of Smoke Detectors.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Future Tasks and Benchmark Exercises. C/171-178 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/297-302 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Keski-Rahkonen, O.
• NIST Large Fire Laboratory.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Presentation and Tour of Test Facility. C/81-84 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/179-188 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Mulholland, G. W.
• Numerical Simulation of a Compartment Fire in a Nuclear Power Plant Containment Building.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/141-168 pp, 2003.
  Floyd, J. D.
• Overview of the FLAMME_S Code Validation Matrix.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Validation of Fire Models. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, C/39-57 pp, 2003.
  Bouton, E.
• Preliminary Results for Benchmark Exercise #2 Using CFAST and JASMINE.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Preliminary Results of Benchmark Exercise #2, Part 1, Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Facility Applications. C/161-163 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/275-286 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Miles, S.
• Regulatory Requirements for Performance Based Codes Using Mathematical Risk Assessment.
  Interscience Communications Ltd.; National Institute of Standards and Technology; Building Research Establishment; and Society of Fire Protection Engineers; Swedish National Testing and Research Institute. Interflam '96. International Interflam Conference, 7th Proceedings. March 26-28, 1996, Cambridge, England, Interscience Communications Ltd., London, England, Franks, C. A.; Grayson, S., Editor(s)(s), 621-630 pp, 1996.
  Brannigan, V. M.; Smidts, C.; Kilpatrick, A.
• Report of Experimental Results for the International Fire Model Benchmarking and Validation Exercise #3.
  NIST SP 1013-1; NIST Special Publication 1013-1; NUREG/CR-6905; 189 p. June 2005.
  Hamins, A.; Maranghides, A.; Johnsson, E. L.; Donnelly, M. K.; Yang, J. C.; Mulholland, G. W.; Anleitner, R. L.
• Simulation of a Single Room Problem Using Code MAGIC. Appendix C.
  NISTIR 6872; June 2002.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Cable Tray Fires. International Panel Report. Appendix C: Benchmark Analysis With MAGIC, C/1-16 pp, 2002.
  Gautier, B.; Ernandorena, H.; Kaercher, M.
• Simulations Using JASMINE and CFAST. Benchmark Analysis With JASMINE AND CFAST. Appendix G.
  NISTIR 6872; June 2002.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Cable Tray Fires. International Panel Report. Appendix G: Benchmark Analysis With JASMINE and CFAST, G/1-24 pp, 2002.
  Miles, S.
• Simulations With MAGIC (V 3.4.7). Benchmark Exercise #1. Appendix E.
  NISTIR 6872; June 2002.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Cable Tray Fires. International Panel Report. Appendix E: Benchmark Analysis With MAGIC, E/1-7 pp, 2002.
  Joyeux, D.; Lecoz-Jammes, O.
• Study of Cable Tray Fires of Redundant Safety Trains With the Flamme[underscore]S Code. Appendix A.
  NISTIR 6872; June 2002.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Evaluation of Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Cable Tray Fires. International Panel Report. Appendix A: Benchmark Analysis With Flamme[underscore]S, A/1-39 pp, 2002.
  Bouton, E.; Tourniaire, B.
• Use of Fire Models in Risk Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. Regulatory Applications of Fire Models. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/39-49 pp, 2003.
  Brandes, D.
• U.S. NRC Goals and Plans for Research to Support Risk-Informed Regulation.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Opening Remarks and Research Program. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/1-5 pp, 2003.
  Cunningham, M.
• Verification and Validation: How to Determine the Accuracy of Fire Models.
  Fire Protection Engineering, No. 34, 34,36,38,40,42,44, Spring 2007.
  Salley, M. H.; Dreisbach, J.; Hill, K.; Kassawara, R.; Najafi, B.; Joglar, F.; Hamins, A.; McGrattan, K. B.; Peacock, R. D.; Gautier, B.
• Verification and Validation of CFAST.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Valication of Fire Models. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/115-140 pp, 2003.
  Jones, W. W.
• Verification and Validation of Selected Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Volume 2. Experimental Uncertainty.
  NUREG-1824; EPRI 1011999; Volume 2; 105 p. May 2007.
  Hamins, A.; McGrattan, K. B.
• Verification and Validation of Selected Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Volume 5. Consolidated Fire Growth and Smoke Transport Model (CFAST).
  NUREG-1824; EPRI 1011999; Volume 5; 206 p. May 2007.
  Peacock, R. D.; Reneke, P. A.
• Verification and Validation of Selected Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Volume 7. Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS).
  NUREG-1824; EPRI 1011999; Volume 7; 205 p. May 2007.
  McGrattan, K. B.
• Verification, Validation and Selected Applications of the VULCAN and FUEGO Fire Field Models.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX D. View Graphs Used for Presentations: Valication of Fire Models. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, D/169-177 pp, 2003.
  Gritzo, L. A.
• Workshop on Building Occupant Movement During Fire Emergencies, June 10-11, 2004, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  NIST SP 1032; NIST Special Publication 1032; 105 p. January 2005.Workshop on Building Occupant Movement During Fire Emergencies. Proceedings. June 10-11, 2004, Gaithersburg, MD, Peacock, R. D.; Kuligowski, E. D., Editor(s)(s), 2005.
  Peacock, R. D.; Kuligowski, E. D.
• Zone Model Validation of Room Fire Scenarios.
  NISTIR 6986; 569 p. September 2003.International Collaborative Project to Evaluate Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications: Summary of 5th Meeting. APPENDIX C. SUMMARY PAPERS: Validation of Fire Models. C/59-72 pp and APPENDIX D. VIEW GRAPHS USED FOR PRESENTATIONS. D/79-86 pp. May 2-3, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, 2003.
  Keski-Rahkonen, O.; Hostikka, S.